Late Dacron Patch Inflammatory Reaction after Carotid Endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to analyse the incidence and presentation of carotid patch inflammatory reactions following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: This was a cohort study using a prospectively maintained database. All patients who underwent elective CEA at a tertiary vascular centre between 2002 and 2016 were included. Computed tomography scan angiogram, duplex scan, and leucocyte scintigraphy were used to assess patients with suspected inflammatory patch complications. Re-intervention procedures and outcomes were noted. Histopathology and organisms cultured from the harvested material during re-intervention were assessed. RESULTS: During the study period, 633 patients underwent elective CEA. Fifty-one underwent eversion endarterectomy: 111 did not require a patch, whereas 471 patients had a patch repair. Four hundred and twenty eight had a Dacron patch repair and 43 a biological patch. Eight patients returned with late Dacron patch inflammatory complications (1.3% of all CEA and 1.9% of Dacron patch closures) after a period ranging from 18 months to 7 years (mean 4.1 ± 2.1 years). Seven of the eight patients underwent surgical re-intervention, and the eighth patient was deemed high surgical risk. One patient underwent a vein bypass, three had vein patch repair, one required internal carotid artery (ICA) ligation after patch excision, and two were managed by debridement, with omohyoid and sternomastoid muscle covering of the patch. The patient who required ICA ligation suffered a fatal stroke. The remaining patients had a satisfactory outcome. All patients showed evidence of foreign body reaction in pathological examination with no pathological organism cultured from swabs or tissue harvested during surgery. CONCLUSION: Late wound complications after CEA may be related to inflammatory reaction of the Dacron patch rather than infection. Infection should be excluded first. Reconstruction with vein is effective. However, debridement with sternomastoid and omohyoid muscle covering of the patch may be considered in high risk patients after exclusion of infection with regular follow-up.

Incidental discovery of a long standing arteriovenous fistula after thrombectomy for acute lower limb ischaemia.

INTRODUCTION: Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the abnormal connection between an artery and vein. Congenital AVF of the popliteal artery is very rare. PRESENTATION OF CASE: 89 year old lady presented with right acute lower limb ischaemia. She had unilateral chronic venous hypertensive change in the right leg. Femoral embolectomy was performed. Backflow was achieved. Arteriotomy was closed. The patient's leg continued to deteriorate. She returned to theatre. On-table angiogram showed an occluded SFA. Thrombectomy was completed. SFA was patent but no blood flowed into the distal popliteal artery. A second on table angiogram revealed AVF between popliteal artery and vein. Dissection to the posterior aspect of the knee revealed the fistula. The vein was arterialized and enlarged. The AVF was ligated. Normal distal blood flow was achieved. Retrospectively we measured the leg lengths. Right leg was 3cm longer than the left. The right leg circumference was 7cm greater than the left. She reported chronic venous change from a young age. She did not report any history of trauma to the limb. DISCUSSION: Popliteal artery to popliteal vein fistula is a rare. Trauma is the most common cause of popliteal AVF. Should the condition develop before closure of the epiphyses, there may be an increase in leg measurements. CONCLUSION: We postulate that this case of AV fistula may be congenital due to discrepancy in leg measurements and unilateral chronic venous hypertensive change. Rarely persistent remnants of the embryonic sciatic artery can lead to arteriovenous anastomoses, which may be a possible aetiology.

Secondary aortoduodenal fistula following endovascular repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm due to Streptococcus anginosus infection: A case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Aortoenteric fistula is a rare but very serious complication of both surgical and endovascular abdominal aortic reconstruction. Since the advent of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), 20 cases of aortoduodenal fistula associated with aortic stent grafts have been reported.(1) However, only a handful has been reported following inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. It most commonly presents with bleeding, usually from the upper gastro-intestinal tract. With recent advances in the screening, diagnosis and management of abdominal aortic aneurysms either surgically or through an endovascular approach, the diagnosis of an aortoduodenal fistula in patients with gastro-intestinal bleeding must be suspected and excluded. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We describe a case of secondary aortoduodenal fistula that occurred two and a half years following endovascular stent graft repair of an inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm. We also outline the emergency correction plan and the attempts at repair. DISCUSSION: This case defies the general concept that patients with inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms are relatively immune to rupture. Although the presence of a peri-aneurysm thick inflammatory membrane decreases the possibility of rupture, these patients are more susceptible to other related complications such as aorto-enteric and aorto-caval fistulas.(2) This case also demonstrates the peculiar presence of Streptococcus anginosus as the pathological organism leading to graft infection and subsequent fistula, as opposed to enterococci which are often found in endograft infection. CONCLUSION: Aorto-enteric fistulas are associated with a grave prognosis. Early diagnosis is crucial and extra vigilance should be taken in cases of inflammatory AAA.